Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
| |
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017
OR
|
| |
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-3523
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Kansas | | 48-0290150 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
| | |
818 South Kansas Avenue, Topeka, Kansas 66612 | | (785) 575-6300 |
(Address, including Zip code and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Large accelerated filer X Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
| | |
Common Stock, par value $5.00 per share | | 142,093,321 shares |
(Class) | | (Outstanding at May 3, 2017) |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | |
| Page |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
| |
Item 1. | | |
Item 1A. | | |
Item 2. | | |
Item 3. | | |
Item 4. | | |
Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
| | |
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
The following is a glossary of frequently used abbreviations or acronyms that are found throughout this report.
|
| | |
Abbreviation or Acronym | | Definition |
2016 Form 10-K | | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 |
AFUDC | | Allowance for funds used during construction |
ARO | | Asset retirement obligation |
CAA | | Clean Air Act |
CCR | | Coal combustion residual |
CO2 | | Carbon dioxide |
COLI | | Corporate-owned life insurance |
CPP | | Clean Power Plan |
CWA | | Clean Water Act |
DOE | | Department of Energy |
ELG | | Effluent limitations guidelines |
EPA | | Environmental Protection Agency |
FASB | | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC | | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
FMBs | | First mortgage bonds |
FPA | | Federal Power Act |
GHG | | Greenhouse gas |
Great Plains Energy | | Great Plains Energy Incorporated |
HSR Act | | Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act |
JEC | | Jeffrey Energy Center |
KCC | | Kansas Corporation Commission |
KDHE | | Kansas Department of Health & Environment |
KGE | | Kansas Gas and Electric Company |
La Cygne | | La Cygne Generating Station |
Merger | | Pending acquisition of Westar Energy, Inc. by Great Plains Energy |
MPSC | | Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri |
NAAQS | | National Ambient Air Quality Standards |
NAV | | Net Asset Value |
NDT | | Nuclear Decommissioning Trust |
NOx | | Nitrogen oxides |
NRC | | Nuclear Regulatory Commission |
NSPS | | New Source Performance Standard |
OPC | | Office of Public Counsel |
PM | | Particulate matter |
RECA | | Retail energy cost adjustment |
RSU | | Restricted share unit |
RTO | | Regional transmission organization |
SO2 | | Sulfur dioxide |
SPP | | Southwest Power Pool, Inc. |
TFR | | Transmission formula rate |
VIE | | Variable interest entity |
Westinghouse | | Westinghouse Electric Company |
Wolf Creek | | Wolf Creek Generating Station |
WOTUS | | Waters of the United States |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-Q are “forward-looking statements.” The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 has established that these statements qualify for safe harbors from liability. Forward-looking statements may include words like we “believe,” “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend” and words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements describe our future plans, objectives, expectations or goals. Such statements address future events and conditions concerning matters such as, but not limited to:
| |
- | the pending acquisition (merger) of Westar Energy, Inc. by Great Plains Energy Incorporated (Great Plains Energy), |
| |
- | amount, type and timing of capital expenditures, |
| |
- | liquidity and capital resources, |
| |
- | compliance with debt and other restrictive covenants, |
| |
- | interest rates and dividends, |
| |
- | the overall economy of our service area and its impact on our customers’ demand for electricity and their ability to pay for service. |
What happens in each case could vary materially from what we expect because of such things as:
| |
- | risks related to operating in a heavily regulated industry that is subject to unpredictable political, legislative, judicial and regulatory developments, which can impact our operations, results of operations, and financial condition, |
| |
- | the difficulty of predicting the magnitude and timing of changes in demand for electricity, including with respect to emerging competing services and technologies and conservation and energy efficiency measures, |
| |
- | the impact of weather conditions, including as it relates to sales of electricity and prices of energy commodities, |
| |
- | equipment damage from storms and extreme weather, |
| |
- | economic and capital market conditions, including the impact of inflation or deflation, changes in interest rates, the cost and availability of capital and the market for trading wholesale energy, |
| |
- | the impact of changes in market conditions on employee benefit liability calculations and funding obligations, as well as actual and assumed investment returns on invested plan assets, |
| |
- | the impact of changes in estimates regarding our Wolf Creek Generating Station (Wolf Creek) decommissioning obligation, |
| |
- | the existence or introduction of competition into markets in which we operate, |
| |
- | the impact of changing laws and regulations relating to air and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water emissions, waste management and other environmental matters, |
| |
- | risks associated with execution of our planned capital expenditure program, including timing and receipt of regulatory approvals necessary for planned construction and expansion projects as well as the ability to complete planned construction projects within the terms and time frames anticipated, |
| |
- | cost, availability and timely provision of equipment, supplies, labor and fuel we need to operate our business, |
| |
- | availability of generating capacity and the performance of our generating plants, |
| |
- | changes in regulation of nuclear generating facilities and nuclear materials and fuel, including possible shutdown or required modification of nuclear generating facilities, |
| |
- | uncertainties with respect to procurement of nuclear fuel and related services, which are dependent on a single supplier, |
| |
- | additional regulation due to Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) oversight to ensure the safe operation of Wolf Creek, either related to Wolf Creek’s performance, or potentially relating to events or performance at a nuclear plant anywhere in the world, |
| |
- | uncertainty regarding the establishment of interim or permanent sites for spent nuclear fuel storage and disposal, |
| |
- | homeland and information and operating systems security considerations, |
| |
- | our inability to fully utilize expected tax credits, |
| |
- | changes in accounting requirements and other accounting matters, |
| |
- | changes in the energy markets in which we participate and the effect of the retroactive repricing of transactions in such markets following execution because of changes or adjustments in market pricing mechanisms by regional transmission organizations (RTOs) and independent system operators, |
| |
- | reduced demand for coal-based energy because of actual or potential climate impacts and the development of alternate energy sources, |
| |
- | current and future litigation, regulatory investigations, proceedings or inquiries, |
| |
- | cost of fuel used in generation and wholesale electricity prices, |
| |
- | certain risks and uncertainties associated with the merger, including, without limitation, those related to: |
| |
- | the timing of, and the conditions imposed by, regulatory approvals required for the merger, |
| |
- | the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement or could otherwise cause the failure of the merger to close, |
| |
- | the outcome of any legal proceedings, regulatory proceedings or enforcement matters that have been or may be instituted in connection with the merger, |
| |
- | the receipt of an unsolicited offer from another party to acquire our assets or capital stock (or those of Great Plains Energy) that could interfere with the proposed merger, |
| |
- | the timing to consummate the proposed transaction, |
| |
- | disruption from the proposed transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with customers, employees, regulators or suppliers, |
| |
- | the diversion of management time and attention on the transaction, |
| |
- | the amount of costs, fees, expenses and charges related to the merger, and |
| |
- | the effect and timing of changes in laws or in governmental regulations (including environmental laws and regulations) that could adversely affect our participation in the merger, and |
| |
- | other factors discussed elsewhere in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (2016 Form 10-K), including in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and in other reports we file from time to time with the SEC. |
These lists are not all-inclusive because it is not possible to predict all factors. This report should be read in its entirety and in conjunction with our 2016 Form 10-K and the other reports we file from time to time with the SEC. No one section of this report deals with all aspects of the subject matter and additional information on some matters that could impact our consolidated financial results may be included in our 2016 Form 10-K and the other reports we file from time to time with the SEC. The reader should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, as forward-looking statements speak only as of the date such statements were made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement was made.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM I. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Par Values)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
ASSETS | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS: | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,359 |
| | $ | 3,066 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,420 and $6,667, respectively | 237,032 |
| | 288,579 |
|
Fuel inventory and supplies | 310,861 |
| | 300,125 |
|
Taxes receivable | — |
| | 13,000 |
|
Prepaid expenses | 20,841 |
| | 16,528 |
|
Regulatory assets | 121,937 |
| | 117,383 |
|
Other | 27,070 |
| | 29,701 |
|
Total Current Assets | 721,100 |
| | 768,382 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET | 9,321,669 |
| | 9,248,359 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES, NET | 255,321 |
| | 257,904 |
|
OTHER ASSETS: | | | |
Regulatory assets | 751,437 |
| | 762,479 |
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust | 212,820 |
| | 200,122 |
|
Other | 253,243 |
| | 249,828 |
|
Total Other Assets | 1,217,500 |
| | 1,212,429 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 11,515,590 |
| | $ | 11,487,074 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | — |
| | $ | 125,000 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities | 28,538 |
| | 26,842 |
|
Short-term debt | 226,300 |
| | 366,700 |
|
Accounts payable | 162,231 |
| | 220,522 |
|
Accrued dividends | 55,771 |
| | 52,885 |
|
Accrued taxes | 126,497 |
| | 85,729 |
|
Accrued interest | 85,612 |
| | 72,519 |
|
Regulatory liabilities | 11,973 |
| | 15,760 |
|
Other | 69,816 |
| | 81,236 |
|
Total Current Liabilities | 766,738 |
| | 1,047,193 |
|
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: | | | |
Long-term debt, net | 3,685,752 |
| | 3,388,670 |
|
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net | 82,663 |
| | 111,209 |
|
Deferred income taxes | 1,767,299 |
| | 1,752,776 |
|
Unamortized investment tax credits | 209,968 |
| | 210,654 |
|
Regulatory liabilities | 226,943 |
| | 223,693 |
|
Accrued employee benefits | 511,368 |
| | 512,412 |
|
Asset retirement obligations | 349,933 |
| | 323,951 |
|
Other | 83,757 |
| | 83,326 |
|
Total Long-Term Liabilities | 6,917,683 |
| | 6,606,691 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Notes 11 and 12) |
|
| |
|
|
EQUITY: | | | |
Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity: | | | |
Common stock, par value $5 per share; authorized 275,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 142,047,633 shares and 141,791,153 shares, respective to each date | 710,238 |
| | 708,956 |
|
Paid-in capital | 2,015,287 |
| | 2,018,317 |
|
Retained earnings | 1,080,268 |
| | 1,078,602 |
|
Total Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity | 3,805,793 |
| | 3,805,875 |
|
Noncontrolling Interests | 25,376 |
| | 27,315 |
|
Total Equity | 3,831,169 |
| | 3,833,190 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | $ | 11,515,590 |
| | $ | 11,487,074 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
REVENUES | $ | 572,574 |
| | $ | 569,450 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: | | | |
Fuel and purchased power | 113,855 |
| | 100,058 |
|
SPP network transmission costs | 60,674 |
| | 60,760 |
|
Operating and maintenance | 81,198 |
| | 77,757 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 88,625 |
| | 83,640 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 59,157 |
| | 56,456 |
|
Taxes other than income tax | 42,716 |
| | 48,968 |
|
Total Operating Expenses | 446,225 |
| | 427,639 |
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 126,349 |
| | 141,811 |
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | | | |
Investment earnings | 3,155 |
| | 2,016 |
|
Other income | 1,300 |
| | 9,477 |
|
Other expense | (5,316 | ) | | (5,543 | ) |
Total Other (Expense) Income | (861 | ) | | 5,950 |
|
Interest expense | 41,095 |
| | 40,431 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 84,393 |
| | 107,330 |
|
Income tax expense | 20,911 |
| | 38,622 |
|
NET INCOME | 63,482 |
| | 68,708 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3,821 |
| | 3,123 |
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. | $ | 59,661 |
| | $ | 65,585 |
|
BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. (See Note 2): | | | |
Basic earnings per common share | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
AVERAGE EQUIVALENT COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: | | | |
Basic | 142,436,622 |
| | 141,992,846 |
|
Diluted | 142,695,606 |
| | 142,311,228 |
|
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.38 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Net income | $ | 63,482 |
| | $ | 68,708 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | 88,625 |
| | 83,640 |
|
Amortization of nuclear fuel | 8,069 |
| | 8,329 |
|
Amortization of deferred regulatory gain from sale leaseback | (1,374 | ) | | (1,374 | ) |
Amortization of corporate-owned life insurance | 5,901 |
| | 5,261 |
|
Non-cash compensation | 2,468 |
| | 2,491 |
|
Net deferred income taxes and credits | 19,011 |
| | 33,984 |
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction | (775 | ) | | (2,464 | ) |
Changes in working capital items: | | | |
Accounts receivable | 51,547 |
| | 33,196 |
|
Fuel inventory and supplies | (10,581 | ) | | 109 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 27,399 |
| | 7,712 |
|
Accounts payable | (23,135 | ) | | (31,158 | ) |
Accrued taxes | 47,775 |
| | 49,339 |
|
Other current liabilities | (54,223 | ) | | (28,984 | ) |
Changes in other assets | 2,328 |
| | 21,933 |
|
Changes in other liabilities | 10,606 |
| | (11,846 | ) |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | 237,123 |
| | 238,876 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Additions to property, plant and equipment | (175,400 | ) | | (220,849 | ) |
Purchase of securities - trusts | (4,191 | ) | | (13,712 | ) |
Sale of securities - trusts | 5,720 |
| | 16,332 |
|
Proceeds from investment in corporate-owned life insurance | 103 |
| | 23,963 |
|
Investment in affiliated company | — |
| | (655 | ) |
Other investing activities | (2,354 | ) | | (2,840 | ) |
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities | (176,122 | ) | | (197,761 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Short-term debt, net | (140,407 | ) | | 66,500 |
|
Proceeds from long-term debt | 296,475 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from long-term debt of variable interest entities | — |
| | 162,048 |
|
Retirements of long-term debt | (125,000 | ) | | — |
|
Retirements of long-term debt of variable interest entities | (26,840 | ) | | (190,355 | ) |
Repayment of capital leases | (800 | ) | | (675 | ) |
Borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance | 910 |
| | 963 |
|
Repayment of borrowings against cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance | — |
| | (22,837 | ) |
Issuance of common stock | 470 |
| | 657 |
|
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests | (5,760 | ) | | (2,550 | ) |
Cash dividends paid | (52,750 | ) | | (49,665 | ) |
Other financing activities | (7,006 | ) | | (4,961 | ) |
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities | (60,708 | ) | | (40,875 | ) |
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 293 |
| | 240 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS: | | | |
Beginning of period | 3,066 |
| | 3,231 |
|
End of period | $ | 3,359 |
| | $ | 3,471 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Westar Energy, Inc. Shareholders | | | | |
| | Common stock shares | | Common stock | | Paid-in capital | | Retained earnings | | Non-controlling interests | | Total equity |
Balance as of December 31, 2015 | | 141,353,426 |
| | $ | 706,767 |
| | $ | 2,004,124 |
| | $ | 945,830 |
| | $ | 15,242 |
| | $ | 3,671,963 |
|
Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 65,585 |
| | 3,123 |
| | 68,708 |
|
Issuance of stock | | 14,907 |
| | 75 |
| | 582 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 657 |
|
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends | | 260,229 |
| | 1,301 |
| | 1,104 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,405 |
|
Tax withholding related to stock compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,961 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (4,961 | ) |
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.38 per share) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (54,805 | ) | | — |
| | (54,805 | ) |
Stock compensation expense | | — |
| | — |
| | 2,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,462 |
|
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,550 | ) | | (2,550 | ) |
Cumulative effect of accounting change - stock compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,326 |
| | — |
| | 3,326 |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2016 | | 141,628,562 |
| | $ | 708,143 |
| | $ | 2,003,311 |
| | $ | 959,936 |
| | $ | 15,815 |
| | $ | 3,687,205 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance as of December 31, 2016 | | 141,791,153 |
| | $ | 708,956 |
| | $ | 2,018,317 |
| | $ | 1,078,602 |
| | $ | 27,315 |
| | $ | 3,833,190 |
|
Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 59,661 |
| | 3,821 |
| | 63,482 |
|
Issuance of stock | | 8,646 |
| | 43 |
| | 427 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 470 |
|
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends | | 247,834 |
| | 1,239 |
| | 1,110 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,349 |
|
Tax withholding related to stock compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,006 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (7,006 | ) |
Dividends declared on common stock ($0.40 per share) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (57,995 | ) | | — |
| | (57,995 | ) |
Stock compensation expense | | — |
| | — |
| | 2,439 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,439 |
|
Distributions to shareholders of noncontrolling interests | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (5,760 | ) | | (5,760 | ) |
Balance as of March 31, 2017 | | 142,047,633 |
| | $ | 710,238 |
| | $ | 2,015,287 |
| | $ | 1,080,268 |
| | $ | 25,376 |
| | $ | 3,831,169 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
We are the largest electric utility in Kansas. Unless the context otherwise indicates, all references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words are to Westar Energy, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The term “Westar Energy” refers to Westar Energy, Inc., a Kansas corporation incorporated in 1924, alone and not together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
We provide electric generation, transmission and distribution services to approximately 701,000 customers in Kansas. Westar Energy provides these services in central and northeastern Kansas, including the cities of Topeka, Lawrence, Manhattan, Salina and Hutchinson. Kansas Gas and Electric Company (KGE), Westar Energy’s wholly-owned subsidiary, provides these services in south-central and southeastern Kansas, including the city of Wichita. Both Westar Energy and KGE conduct business using the name Westar Energy. Our corporate headquarters is located at 818 South Kansas Avenue, Topeka, Kansas 66612.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation
We prepare our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP for the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. Our condensed consolidated financial statements include all operating divisions, majority owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities (VIEs) of which we maintain a controlling interest or are the primary beneficiary reported as a single reportable segment. Undivided interests in jointly-owned generation facilities are included on a proportionate basis. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements, have been included.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our 2016 Form 10-K.
Use of Management’s Estimates
When we prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including those related to depreciation, unbilled revenue, valuation of investments, forecasted fuel costs included in our retail energy cost adjustment (RECA) billed to customers, income taxes, pension and post-retirement benefits, our asset retirement obligations (AROs) including the decommissioning of Wolf Creek, environmental issues, VIEs, contingencies and litigation. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
Fuel Inventory and Supplies
We state fuel inventory and supplies at average cost. Following are the balances for fuel inventory and supplies stated separately.
|
| | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (In Thousands) |
Fuel inventory | $ | 115,921 |
| | $ | 107,086 |
|
Supplies | 194,940 |
| | 193,039 |
|
Fuel inventory and supplies | $ | 310,861 |
| | $ | 300,125 |
|
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) represents the allowed cost of capital used to finance utility construction activity. We compute AFUDC by applying a composite rate to qualified construction work in progress. We credit other income (for equity funds) and interest expense (for borrowed funds) for the amount of AFUDC capitalized as construction cost on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Dollars In Thousands) |
Borrowed funds | $ | 1,853 |
| | $ | 2,008 |
|
Equity funds | 775 |
| | 2,464 |
|
Total | $ | 2,628 |
| | $ | 4,472 |
|
Average AFUDC Rates | 2.2 | % | | 5.2 | % |
Earnings Per Share
We have participating securities in the form of unvested restricted share units (RSUs) with nonforfeitable rights to dividend equivalents that receive dividends on an equal basis with dividends declared on common shares. As a result, we apply the two-class method of computing basic and diluted EPS.
To compute basic EPS, we divide the earnings allocated to common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes the effect of issuable common shares resulting from our RSUs with forfeitable rights to dividend equivalents. We compute the dilutive effect of potential issuances of common shares using the treasury stock method.
The following table reconciles our basic and diluted EPS from net income.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
| (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) |
Net income | $ | 63,482 |
| | $ | 68,708 |
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3,821 |
| | 3,123 |
|
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc. | 59,661 |
| | 65,585 |
|
Less: Net income allocated to RSUs | 108 |
| | 135 |
|
Net income allocated to common stock | $ | 59,553 |
| | $ | 65,450 |
|
| | | |
Weighted average equivalent common shares outstanding – basic | 142,436,622 |
| | 141,992,846 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: | | | |
RSUs | 258,984 |
| | 318,382 |
|
Weighted average equivalent common shares outstanding – diluted (a) | 142,695,606 |
| | 142,311,228 |
|
| | | |
Earnings per common share, basic | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
Earnings per common share, diluted | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
|
_______________
(a)We had no antidilutive securities for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
|
| | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 |
| (In Thousands) |
CASH PAID FOR (RECEIVED FROM): | | | |
Interest on financing activities, net of amount capitalized | $ | 35,644 |
| | $ | 30,415 |
|
Interest on financing activities of VIEs | 1,696 |
| | 4,150 |
|
Income taxes, net of refunds | (13,000 | ) | | (383 | ) |
NON-CASH INVESTING TRANSACTIONS: | | | |
Property, plant and equipment additions | 97,196 |
| | 130,532 |
|
NON-CASH FINANCING TRANSACTIONS: | | | |
Issuance of stock for compensation and reinvested dividends | 2,349 |
| | 2,405 |
|
Assets acquired through capital leases | 293 |
| | 180 |
|
New Accounting Pronouncements
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP for the United States of America. To address current issues in accounting, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued the following new accounting pronouncements that may affect our accounting and/or disclosure.
Compensation - Retirement Benefits
In March 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2017-07, which requires employers to disaggregate the service cost component from other components of net periodic benefit costs and to disclose the amounts of net periodic benefit costs that are included in each income statement line item. The standard requires employers to report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs and to report the other components of net periodic benefit costs (which include interest costs, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost or credits and actuarial gains and losses) separately and outside a subtotal of operating income. Of the components of net periodic benefit cost, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization as property, plant and equipment, which is to be applied prospectively. The other components of net periodic benefit costs that are no longer eligible for capitalization as property, plant and equipment will be recorded as a regulatory asset. The guidance changing the presentation in the statements of income is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The new standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are evaluating the guidance and do not expect it to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which addresses revenue from contracts with customers. Subsequent ASUs have been released providing modifications and clarifications to ASU No. 2014-09. The objective of the new guidance is to establish principles to report useful information to users of financial statements about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue from contracts with customers. Under the new standard, an entity must identify the performance obligations in a contract, determine the transaction price and allocate the price to specific performance obligations to recognize the revenue when the obligation is completed. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early application of the standard is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective application or cumulative effect transition method. We have not yet selected a transition method. We continue to analyze the impact of the new revenue standard and related ASUs. During 2016, initial revenue contract assessments were completed. In summary, material revenue streams were identified and representative contract/transaction types were sampled. We also continue to monitor unresolved industry issues, including items related to contributions in aid of construction, collectability and alternative revenue programs, and will analyze the related impacts to revenue recognition. Based upon our completed assessments, we do not expect the impact on our consolidated financial statements to be material.
3. PENDING MERGER
On May 29, 2016, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger (merger) with Great Plains Energy, providing for the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy with and into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy. At the closing of the merger, our shareholders will receive cash and shares of Great Plains Energy. Each issued and outstanding share of our common stock, other than certain restricted shares, will be canceled and automatically converted into $51.00 in cash, without interest, and a number of shares of Great Plains Energy common stock equal to an exchange ratio that may vary between 0.2709 and 0.3148, based upon the volume-weighted average share price of Great Plains Energy common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the 20 consecutive full trading days ending on (and including) the third trading day immediately prior to the closing date of the transaction. Based on the closing price per share of Great Plains Energy common stock on the trading day prior to announcement of the merger, our shareholders would receive an implied $60.00 for each share of Westar Energy common stock.
The merger agreement includes certain restrictions and limitations on our ability to declare dividend payments. The merger agreement, without prior approval of Great Plains Energy, limits our quarterly dividends declared in 2017 to $0.40 per share, which represents an annualized increase of $0.08 per share, consistent with last year’s dividend increase.
The closing of the merger is subject to customary conditions including, among others, receipt of required regulatory approvals. On June 28, 2016, we and Great Plains Energy filed a joint application with the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) requesting approval of the merger. On April 19, 2017, the KCC rejected the merger application citing, among other concerns, an excessive purchase price, Great Plains Energy’s capital structure, quantifiable and demonstrable customer benefits and staffing levels in our service territory. On May 4, 2017, we and Great Plains Energy filed with the KCC a petition for reconsideration of the KCC’s order and to set the matter for further proceedings so that we and Great Plains Energy may work together to determine whether it is feasible to develop a revised transaction that addresses the KCC’s concerns. Under applicable Kansas regulations, the KCC has 30 days following the filing of the petition for reconsideration to either deny or grant the petition. If we and Great Plains Energy agree on a revised transaction, then we and Great Plains Energy would expect to file the revised proposal and a supplemental application with the KCC.
In addition, there are two open dockets in Missouri related to the merger. In the first docket, Great Plains Energy sought approval from the Public Service Commission of the State of Missouri (MPSC) to waive certain affiliate transaction rules following the closing of the merger. In this docket, on October 12, 2016, and on October 26, 2016, the MPSC staff and the Office of Public Counsel (OPC), respectively, announced that each had entered into a Stipulation and Agreement with Great Plains Energy that, among other things, provided that MPSC staff and the OPC would not file a complaint, or support another complaint, to assert that the MPSC has jurisdiction over the merger. The Stipulation and Agreements are subject to approval by the MPSC. Regarding the second docket, on October 11, 2016, a consumer group filed complaints against us and Great Plains Energy with the MPSC seeking to have the MPSC assert jurisdiction over the merger, and various parties have intervened in these complaints. The MPSC dismissed the complaint against us on December 6, 2016, but on February 22, 2017, the MPSC ordered that Great Plains Energy was required to obtain MPSC approval prior to consummation of the merger. On February 23, 2017, Great Plains Energy filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of the merger. The merger application docket was consolidated with the affiliate transaction waiver docket. Several parties filed testimony and the evidentiary hearing was held in April 2017. On April 20, 2017, after the KCC’s order rejecting the merger was issued, Great Plains Energy filed a motion to suspend the briefing schedule in the MPSC merger docket, effectively suspending that proceeding indefinitely until Great Plains Energy takes further action in the docket.
On July 11, 2016, we and Great Plains filed a joint application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) requesting approval of the merger. Approval of the merger application requires action by the FERC commissioners because it is a contested application. The Federal Power Act (FPA) requires a quorum of three or more commissioners to act on a contested application. Following the resignation of the FERC Chairman effective February 3, 2017, the FERC commission is comprised only of two commissioners and is therefore unable to act on the application. A new commissioner must be appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, before FERC will be able to act on the application. If the FERC commissioners do not issue an order on the application within 180 days after the application was deemed complete because of the lack of a quorum, approval of the application may be deemed granted by operation of law, unless an order is issued extending the time for review. On May 3, 2017, the FERC staff extended the time period for a review of the application until November 1, 2017. We are unable to predict when FERC will regain a quorum or how the change in commissioners will impact the review of the application.
On April 7, 2017, the NRC approved Wolf Creek’s request of an indirect transfer of control of Wolf Creek’s operating license. The transfer will not be completed until receipt of all required regulatory approvals and written notification is made to the NRC.
On September 26, 2016, we and Great Plains Energy filed the antitrust notifications required under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act) to complete the merger. We and Great Plains Energy received early termination of the statutory waiting period under the HSR Act on October 21, 2016. Under the HSR Act, a new statutory waiting period will start one year from the date on which an existing waiting period expires, or October 21, 2017. Accordingly, if the merger has not closed prior to October 21, 2017, we and Great Plains Energy will need to re-file the necessary HSR Act notifications.
Also on September 26, 2016, the proposed merger was approved by our shareholders. Concurrently, shareholders of Great Plains Energy approved various matters necessary for Great Plains Energy to complete the merger.
The merger agreement, which contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, may be terminated by either party if the merger has not occurred by May 31, 2017. The termination date may be extended six months in order to obtain regulatory approvals. If the merger agreement is terminated under these circumstances, including the failure to obtain regulatory approvals, Great Plains Energy must pay us a termination fee of $380.0 million.
The merger agreement also provides for certain other termination rights for both us and Great Plains Energy. If (a) the merger agreement is terminated by either party because the end date occurred, or by us because Great Plains Energy is in breach of the merger agreement and (b) prior to such termination, an alternative acquisition proposal is made to Great Plains Energy or its board of directors or has been publicly disclosed and not withdrawn and within 12 months after termination of the merger agreement Great Plains Energy enters into an acquisition proposal, Great Plains Energy must pay us a termination fee of $180.0 million. In addition, if either party terminates the merger agreement because the end date occurred, or if Great Plains Energy terminates the merger agreement because we are in breach of the merger agreement, and (a) prior to such termination, an alternative acquisition proposal is made to us or our board of directors or is publicly disclosed and not withdrawn, and (b) within 12 months after termination of the merger agreement, we enter into a definitive agreement or consummate a transaction with respect to an acquisition proposal, we must pay Great Plains Energy a termination fee of $280.0 million.
In connection with this transaction, we have incurred merger-related expenses. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we incurred approximately $0.4 million of merger-related expenses, which are included in our selling, general,
and administrative expenses. In the event the merger is consummated, we expect total merger-related expenses will be approximately $30.0 million, with the majority of the expense to be paid upon closing.
See also Note 12, “Legal Proceedings,” for more information on litigation related to the merger.
4. RATE MATTERS AND REGULATION
KCC Proceedings
In October 2016, we filed an abbreviated rate review with the KCC to update our prices to include capital costs related to La Cygne Generating Station (La Cygne) environmental upgrades, investment to extend the life of Wolf Creek, costs related to programs to improve grid resiliency and costs associated with investments in other environmental projects during 2015. In May 2017, we reached an agreement with the major parties to the rate review. If the agreement is approved by the KCC, we estimate that the new prices will increase our annual retail revenues by approximately $16.4 million. We expect the KCC to issue an order on our request in June 2017.
In March 2017, the KCC issued an order allowing us to adjust our retail prices, subject to refund, to include updated transmission costs as reflected in the transmission formula rate (TFR). The new prices were effective in April 2017 and are expected to increase our annual retail revenues by approximately $12.7 million.
In December 2016, the KCC approved an order allowing us to adjust our prices to include costs incurred for property taxes. The new prices were effective in January 2017 and are expected to decrease our annual retail revenues by approximately $26.8 million.
FERC Proceedings
Our TFR that includes projected 2017 transmission capital expenditures and operating costs was effective in January 2017 and is expected to increase our annual transmission revenues by approximately $29.6 million. This updated rate provided the basis for our request with the KCC to adjust our retail prices to include updated transmission costs as discussed above.
5. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND TRADING SECURITIES
Values of Financial Instruments
GAAP establishes a hierarchical framework for disclosing the transparency of the inputs utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the classification of assets and liabilities within the fair value hierarchy levels. In addition, we measure certain investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value at net asset value (NAV), which are not included in the fair value hierarchy. Further explanation of these levels and NAV is summarized below.
| |
• | Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The types of assets and liabilities included in level 1 are highly liquid and actively traded instruments with quoted prices, such as equities listed on public exchanges. |
| |
• | Level 2 - Pricing inputs are not quoted prices in active markets, but are either directly or indirectly observable. The types of assets and liabilities included in level 2 are typically liquid investments in funds which have a readily determinable fair value calculated using daily NAVs, other financial instruments that are comparable to actively traded securities or contracts, such as treasury securities with pricing interpolated from recent trades of similar securities, or other financial instruments priced with models using highly observable inputs. |
| |
• | Level 3 - Significant inputs to pricing have little or no transparency. The types of assets and liabilities included in level 3 are those with inputs requiring significant management judgment or estimation. |
| |
• | Net Asset Value - Investments that do not have a readily determinable fair value are measured at NAV. These investments do not consider the observability of inputs, therefore, they are not included within the fair value hierarchy. We include in this category investments in private equity, real estate and alternative investment funds |
that do not have a readily determinable fair value. The underlying alternative investments include collateralized debt obligations, mezzanine debt and a variety of other investments.
We record cash and cash equivalents, short-term borrowings and variable-rate debt on our consolidated balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value. We measure the fair value of fixed-rate debt, a level 2 measurement, based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered for instruments of the same remaining maturities and redemption provisions. The recorded amount of accounts receivable and other current financial instruments approximates fair value.
We measure fair value based on information available as of the measurement date. The following table provides the carrying values and measured fair values of our fixed-rate debt.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, 2017 | | As of December 31, 2016 |
| Carrying Value | | Fair Value | | Carrying Value | | Fair Value |
| (In Thousands) |
Fixed-rate debt | $ | 3,605,000 |
| | $ | 3,756,244 |
| | $ | 3,430,000 |
| | $ | 3,597,441 |
|
Fixed-rate debt of VIEs | 111,122 |
| | 111,513 |
| | 137,962 |
| | 139,733 |
|
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table provides the amounts and their corresponding level of hierarchy for our assets that are measured at fair value.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
As of March 31, 2017 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Total |
| | (In Thousands) |
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | $ | — |
| | $ | 59,559 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,894 |
| | $ | 64,453 |
|
International equity funds | | — |
| | 40,287 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 40,287 |
|
Core bond fund | | — |
| | 27,912 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,912 |
|
High-yield bond fund | | — |
| | 18,836 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,836 |
|
Emerging market bond fund | | — |
| | 16,275 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 16,275 |
|
Combination debt/equity/other fund | | — |
| | 14,608 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,608 |
|
Alternative investment fund | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20,107 |
| | 20,107 |
|
Real estate securities fund | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,170 |
| | 10,170 |
|
Cash equivalents | | 172 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 172 |
|
Total Nuclear Decommissioning Trust | | 172 |
| | 177,477 |
| | — |
| | 35,171 |
| | 212,820 |
|
Trading Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | — |
| | 17,165 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17,165 |
|
International equity fund | | — |
| | 4,287 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,287 |
|
Core bond fund | | — |
| | 11,584 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,584 |
|
Total Trading Securities | | — |
| | 33,036 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 33,036 |
|
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value | | $ | 172 |
| | $ | 210,513 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 35,171 |
| | $ | 245,856 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2016 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | NAV | | Total |
| | (In Thousands) |
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | $ | — |
| | $ | 56,312 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 5,056 |
| | $ | 61,368 |
|
International equity funds | | — |
| | 35,944 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 35,944 |
|
Core bond fund | | — |
| | 27,423 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 27,423 |
|
High-yield bond fund | | — |
| | 18,188 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,188 |
|
Emerging market bond fund | | — |
| | 14,738 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14,738 |
|
Combination debt/equity/other fund | | — |
| | 13,484 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 13,484 |
|
Alternative investment fund | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,958 |
| | 18,958 |
|
Real estate securities fund | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9,946 |
| | 9,946 |
|
Cash equivalents | | 73 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 73 |
|
Total Nuclear Decommissioning Trust | | 73 |
| | 166,089 |
| | — |
| | 33,960 |
| | 200,122 |
|
Trading Securities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | — |
| | 18,364 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18,364 |
|
International equity fund | | — |
| | 4,467 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,467 |
|
Core bond fund | | — |
| | 11,504 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,504 |
|
Cash equivalents | | 156 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 156 |
|
Total Trading Securities | | 156 |
| | 34,335 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34,491 |
|
Total Assets Measured at Fair Value | | $ | 229 |
| | $ | 200,424 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 33,960 |
| | $ | 234,613 |
|
Some of our investments in the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust (NDT) are measured at NAV and do not have readily determinable fair values. These investments are either with investment companies or companies that follow accounting guidance consistent with investment companies. In certain situations, these investments may have redemption restrictions. The following table provides additional information on these investments.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of March 31, 2017 | | As of December 31, 2016 | | As of March 31, 2017 |
| Fair Value | | Unfunded Commitments | | Fair Value | | Unfunded Commitments | | Redemption Frequency | | Length of Settlement |
| (In Thousands) | | | | |
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | $ | 4,894 |
|
| $ | 3,349 |
| | $ | 5,056 |
| | $ | 3,529 |
| | (a) | | (a) |
Alternative investment fund (b) | 20,107 |
| | — |
| | 18,958 |
| | — |
| | Quarterly | | 65 days |
Real estate securities fund (b) | 10,170 |
|
| — |
| | 9,946 |
| | — |
| | Quarterly | | 65 days |
Total Nuclear Decommissioning Trust | $ | 35,171 |
| | $ | 3,349 |
| | $ | 33,960 |
| | $ | 3,529 |
| | | | |
_______________
| |
(a) | This investment is in four long-term private equity funds that do not permit early withdrawal. Our investments in these funds cannot be distributed until the underlying investments have been liquidated, which may take years from the date of initial liquidation. Two funds have begun to make distributions. Our initial investment in the third fund occurred in 2013. Our initial investment in the fourth fund occurred in the second quarter of 2016. The term of the third and fourth fund is 15 years, subject to the general partner’s right to extend the term for up to three additional one-year periods. |
| |
(b) | There is a holdback on final redemptions. |
Price Risk
We use various types of fuel, including coal, natural gas, uranium and diesel to operate our plants and also purchase power to meet customer demand. Our prices and consolidated financial results are exposed to market risks from commodity price changes for electricity and other energy-related products as well as from interest rates. Volatility in these markets impacts our costs of purchased power, costs of fuel for our generating plants and our participation in energy markets. We strive to manage our customers’ and our exposure to market risks through regulatory, operating and financing activities and, when we deem appropriate, we economically hedge a portion of these risks through the use of derivative financial instruments for non-trading purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
We have entered into numerous fixed and variable rate debt obligations. We manage our interest rate risk related to these debt obligations by limiting our exposure to variable interest rate debt, diversifying maturity dates and entering into treasury yield hedge transactions. We may also use other financial derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps.
6. FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS
We report our investments in equity and debt securities at fair value and use the specific identification method to determine their realized gains and losses. We classify these investments as either trading securities or available-for-sale securities as described below.
Trading Securities
We hold equity and debt investments that we classify as trading securities in a trust used to fund certain retirement benefit obligations. As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we measured the fair value of trust assets at $33.0 million and $34.5 million, respectively. We include unrealized gains or losses on these securities in investment earnings on our consolidated statements of income. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we recorded unrealized gains of $1.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, on the assets still held.
Available-for-Sale Securities
We hold investments in a trust for the purpose of funding the decommissioning of Wolf Creek. We have classified these investments as available-for-sale and have recorded all such investments at their fair market value as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.
Using the specific identification method to determine cost, we realized no gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017, and a loss of $1.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. We record net realized and unrealized gains and losses in regulatory liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. This reporting is consistent with the method we use to account for the decommissioning costs we recover in our prices. Gains or losses on assets in the trust fund are recorded as increases or decreases, respectively, to regulatory liabilities and could result in lower or higher funding requirements for decommissioning costs, which we believe would be reflected in the prices paid by our customers.
The following table presents the cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and allocation of investments in the NDT fund as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Gross Unrealized | | | | |
Security Type | | Cost | | Gain | | Loss | | Fair Value | | Allocation |
| | (Dollars In Thousands) | | |
As of March 31, 2017: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | $ | 54,038 |
| | $ | 10,725 |
| | $ | (310 | ) | | $ | 64,453 |
| | 30 | % |
International equity funds | | 35,520 |
| | 4,767 |
| | — |
| | 40,287 |
| | 19 | % |
Core bond fund | | 28,360 |
| | — |
| | (448 | ) | | 27,912 |
| | 13 | % |
High-yield bond fund | | 18,782 |
| | 54 |
| | — |
| | 18,836 |
| | 9 | % |
Emerging market bond fund | | 16,997 |
| | — |
| | (722 | ) | | 16,275 |
| | 8 | % |
Combination debt/equity/other fund | | 9,476 |
| | 5,132 |
| | — |
| | 14,608 |
| | 7 | % |
Alternative investment fund | | 15,000 |
| | 5,107 |
| | — |
| | 20,107 |
| | 9 | % |
Real estate securities fund | | 9,500 |
| | 670 |
| | — |
| | 10,170 |
| | 5 | % |
Cash equivalents | | 172 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 172 |
| | <1% |
|
Total | | $ | 187,845 |
| | $ | 26,455 |
| | $ | (1,480 | ) | | $ | 212,820 |
| | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2016: | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | | $ | 53,192 |
| | $ | 8,295 |
| | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | 61,368 |
| | 31 | % |
International equity funds | | 34,502 |
| | 2,075 |
| | (633 | ) | | 35,944 |
| | 18 | % |
Core bond fund | | 27,952 |
| | — |
| | (529 | ) | | 27,423 |
| | 14 | % |
High-yield bond fund | | 18,358 |
| | — |
| | (170 | ) | | 18,188 |
| | 9 | % |
Emerging market bond fund | | 16,397 |
| | — |
| | (1,659 | ) | | 14,738 |
| | 7 | % |
Combination debt/equity/other fund | | 9,171 |
| | 4,313 |
| | — |
| | 13,484 |
| | 7 | % |
Alternative investment fund | | 15,000 |
| | 3,958 |
| | — |
| | 18,958 |
| | 9 | % |
Real estate securities fund | | 9,500 |
| | 446 |
| | — |
| | 9,946 |
| | 5 | % |
Cash equivalents | | 73 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 73 |
| | <1% |
|
Total | | $ | 184,145 |
| | $ | 19,087 |
| | $ | (3,110 | ) | | $ | 200,122 |
| | 100 | % |
The following table presents the fair value and the gross unrealized losses of the available-for-sale securities held in the NDT fund aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less than 12 Months | | 12 Months or Greater | | Total |
| Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | | Gross Unrealized Losses |
| (In Thousands) |
As of March 31, 2017: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | $ | 4,894 |
| | $ | (310 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,894 |
| | $ | (310 | ) |
Core bonds | 27,912 |
| | (448 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 27,912 |
| | (448 | ) |
Emerging market bond fund | — |
| | — |
| | 16,275 |
| | (722 | ) | | 16,275 |
| | (722 | ) |
Total | $ | 32,806 |
| | $ | (758 | ) | | $ | 16,275 |
| | $ | (722 | ) | | $ | 49,081 |
| | $ | (1,480 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2016: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Domestic equity funds | $ | 1,788 |
| | $ | (119 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,788 |
| | $ | (119 | ) |
International equity funds | — |
| | — |
| | 7,489 |
| | (633 | ) | | 7,489 |
| | (633 | ) |
Core bond funds | 27,423 |
| | (529 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 27,423 |
| | (529 | ) |
High-yield bond fund | — |
| | — |
| | 18,188 |
| | (170 | ) | | 18,188 |
| | (170 | ) |
Emerging market bond fund | — |
| | — |
| | 14,738 |
| | (1,659 | ) | | 14,738 |
| | (1,659 | ) |
Total | $ | 29,211 |
| | $ | (648 | ) | | $ | 40,415 |
| | $ | (2,462 | ) | | $ | 69,626 |
| | $ | (3,110 | ) |
7. DEBT FINANCING
In January 2017, Westar Energy retired $125.0 million in principal amount of first mortgage bonds (FMBs) bearing a stated interest at 5.15% maturing January 2017.
In March 2017, Westar Energy issued $300.0 million in principal amount of FMBs bearing a stated interest at 3.10% and maturing April 2027.
8. TAXES
We recorded income tax expense of $20.9 million with an effective income tax rate of 25% for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and income tax expense of $38.6 million with an effective income tax rate of 36% for the same period of 2016. The decrease in the effective income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2017, was due primarily to a decrease in income before income taxes and increases in tax benefits from production tax credits and stock-based compensation.
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, our unrecognized income tax benefits totaled $2.8 million. We do not expect significant changes in our unrecognized income tax benefits in the next 12 months.
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we had no amounts accrued for interest related to our unrecognized income tax benefits. We accrued no penalties at either March 31, 2017, or December 31, 2016.
As of March 31, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we had recorded $1.5 million for probable assessments of taxes other than income taxes.
9. PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
The following table summarizes the net periodic costs for our pension and post-retirement benefit plans prior to the effects of capitalization.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Post-retirement Benefits |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Components of Net Periodic Cost (Benefit): | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 5,218 |
| | $ | 4,664 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | $ | 271 |
|
Interest cost | | 10,621 |
| | 10,959 |
| | 1,314 |
| | 1,393 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | (10,760 | ) | | (10,663 | ) | | (1,718 | ) | | (1,709 | ) |
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | |
Prior service costs | | 171 |
| | 246 |
| | 114 |
| | 114 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain), net | | 5,489 |
| | 5,388 |
| | (195 | ) | | (280 | ) |
Net periodic cost (benefit) before regulatory adjustment | | 10,739 |
| | 10,594 |
| | (214 | ) | | (211 | ) |
Regulatory adjustment (a) | | 3,288 |
| | 3,306 |
| | (478 | ) | | (486 | ) |
Net periodic cost (benefit) | | $ | 14,027 |
| | $ | 13,900 |
| | $ | (692 | ) | | $ | (697 | ) |
_______________
| |
(a) | The regulatory adjustment represents the difference between current period pension or post-retirement benefit expense and the amount of such expense recognized in setting our prices. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we contributed $7.0 million and $6.8 million, respectively, to the Westar Energy pension trust.
10. WOLF CREEK PENSION AND POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
As a co-owner of Wolf Creek, KGE is indirectly responsible for 47% of the liabilities and expenses associated with the Wolf Creek pension and post-retirement benefit plans. The following table summarizes the net periodic costs for KGE’s 47% share of the Wolf Creek pension and post-retirement benefit plans prior to the effects of capitalization.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Post-retirement Benefits |
Three Months Ended March 31, | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| | (In Thousands) |
Components of Net Periodic Cost (Benefit): | | | | | | | | |
Service cost | | $ | 1,950 |
| | $ | 1,687 |
| | $ | 37 |
| | $ | 32 |
|
Interest cost | | 2,475 |
| | 2,414 |
| | 70 |
| | 81 |
|
Expected return on plan assets | | (2,643 | ) | | (2,431 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
Amortization of unrecognized: | | | | | | | | |
Prior service costs | | 14 |
| | 14 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Actuarial loss (gain), net | | 1,245 |
| | 1,089 |
| | (13 | ) | | (4 | ) |
Net periodic cost before regulatory adjustment | | 3,041 |
| | 2,773 |
| | 94 |
| | 109 |
|
Regulatory adjustment (a) | | 247 |
| | 483 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Net periodic cost | | $ | 3,288 |
| | $ | 3,256 |
| | $ | 94 |
| | $ | 109 |
|
_______________
| |
(a) | The regulatory adjustment represents the difference between current period pension or post-retirement benefit expense and the amount of such expense recognized in setting our prices. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we did not fund Wolf Creek’s pension plan. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we funded $1.6 million of Wolf Creek’s pension plan contributions.
11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
Set forth below are descriptions of contingencies related to environmental matters that may impact us or our financial results. Our assessment of these contingencies, which are based on federal and state statutes and regulations, and regulatory agency and judicial interpretations and actions, has evolved over time. There are a variety of final and proposed laws and regulations that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and consolidated financial results. Due in part to the complex nature of environmental laws and regulations, we are unable to assess the impact of potential changes that may develop with respect to the environmental contingencies described below.
Cross-State Air Pollution Update Rule
In September 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized the Cross-State Air Pollution Update Rule. The final rule addresses interstate transport of NOx emissions in 22 states including Kansas, Missouri and Oklahoma during the ozone season and the impact from the formation of ozone on downwind states with respect to the 2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Starting with the 2017 ozone season, the final rule will revise the existing ozone season allowance budgets for Missouri and Oklahoma and will establish an ozone season budget for Kansas. Various states and others are challenging the rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. We do not believe this rule will have a material impact on our operations and consolidated financial results.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA sets NAAQS for certain emissions known as the “criteria pollutants” considered harmful to public health and the environment, including two classes of particulate matter (PM), ozone, NOx (a precursor to ozone), carbon monoxide and sulfur dioxide (SO2), which result from fossil fuel combustion. Areas meeting the NAAQS are designated attainment areas while those that do not meet the NAAQS are considered nonattainment areas. Each state must develop a plan to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the NAAQS. NAAQS must be reviewed by the EPA at five-year intervals.
In October 2015, the EPA strengthened the ozone NAAQS by lowering the standards from 75 ppb to 70 ppb. In September 2016, the Kansas Department of Health & Environment (KDHE) recommended to the EPA that they designate eight counties in the state of Kansas as in attainment with the standard, and each remaining county in Kansas as in attainment/unclassifiable. The EPA is required to make attainment/nonattainment designations for the revised standards by October 2017. If the EPA agrees with the recommended designations for the state of Kansas, we do not believe this will have a material impact on our consolidated financial results.
Various states and others are challenging the revised 2015 ozone NAAQS in the D.C. Circuit. In April 2017, at the request of the EPA the court issued an order holding the case in abeyance because the new administration is planning to review the 2015 ozone NAAQS and determine whether to reconsider all or a portion of the rule.
In December 2012, the EPA strengthened an existing NAAQS for one class of PM. In December 2014, the EPA designated the entire state of Kansas as unclassifiable/in attainment with the standard. We do not believe this will have a material impact on our operations or consolidated financial results.
In 2010, the EPA revised the NAAQS for SO2. In March 2015, a federal court approved a consent decree between the EPA and environmental groups. The decree includes specific SO2 emissions criteria for certain electric generating plants that, if met, required the EPA to promulgate attainment/nonattainment designations for areas surrounding these plants. Tecumseh Energy Center is our only generating station that meets this criteria. In June 2016, the EPA accepted the State of Kansas recommendation to designate the areas surrounding the facility as unclassifiable, completing the second round of the designation process. In addition, in January 2017, KDHE formally recommended to the EPA a 2,000 ton per year limit for Tecumseh Energy Center Unit 7 in order to satisfy the requirements of the 1-hour SO2 Data Requirements Rule which governs the next round of the designations. By agreeing to the 2,000 ton per year limitation, no further characterization of the area surrounding the plant is required.
We continue to communicate with our regulatory agencies regarding these standards and evaluate what impact the revised NAAQS could have on our operations and consolidated financial results. If areas surrounding our facilities are designated in the future as nonattainment and/or we are required to install additional equipment to control emissions at our facilities, it could have a material impact on our operations and consolidated financial results.
Greenhouse Gases
Burning coal and other fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases referred to as GHG. Various regulations under the federal CAA limit CO2 and other GHG emissions, and other measures are being imposed or offered by individual states, municipalities and regional agreements with the goal of reducing GHG emissions.
In October 2015, the EPA published a rule establishing new source performance standards (NSPS) for GHGs that limit CO2 emissions for new, modified and reconstructed coal and natural gas fueled electric generating units to various levels per MWh depending on various characteristics of the units. Legal challenges to the GHG NSPS have been filed in the D.C. Circuit by various states and industry members. Also in October 2015, the EPA published a rule establishing guidelines for states to regulate CO2 emissions from existing power plants. The standards for existing plants are known as the Clean Power Plan (CPP). Under the CPP, interim emissions performance rates must be achieved beginning in 2022 and final emissions performance rates must be achieved by 2030. Legal challenges to the CPP were filed by groups of states and industry members, including our Company, in the D.C. Circuit. In February 2016, after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit denied requests to stay the CPP, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order granting a stay of the rule pending resolution of the legal challenges. In September 2016, oral arguments were heard before an en banc panel of D.C. Circuit judges and a decision on the legal challenges is pending.
In March 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order instructing the EPA to immediately review the CPP and GHG NSPS, and “if appropriate . . . as soon as practicable . . . publish for notice and comment proposed rules suspending, revising or rescinding those rules.” On the same day the Executive Order was signed, the EPA filed motions with the D.C. Circuit asking the court to hold the challenges to the CPP and the GHG NSPS in abeyance while the EPA completes its administrative review of the rules and issues any forthcoming rulemakings. In April 2017, the court issued orders to hold the cases in abeyance for 60 days and requested briefing on whether the cases should be remanded to the EPA or continue to be held in abeyance.
Also in April 2017, the EPA published in the Federal Register a notice of withdrawal of the proposed CPP federal plan, proposed model trading rules and proposed Clean Energy Incentive Program design details, in light of the Executive Order and the agency’s review of the CPP. Also in April 2017, the EPA published a notice in the Federal Register that it is initiating administrative reviews of the CPP and the GHG NSPS in light of the Executive Order.
Due to the future uncertainty of the CPP, we cannot determine the impact on our operations or consolidated financial results, but we believe the cost to comply with the CPP, should it be upheld and implemented in its current or a substantially similar form, could be material.
Water
We discharge some of the water used in our operations. This water may contain substances deemed to be pollutants. Revised rules governing such discharges from coal-fired power plants were issued in November 2015. The final rule establishes effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) and standards for wastewater discharges, including limits on the amount of toxic metals and other pollutants that can be discharged. Implementation timelines for these requirements vary from 2019 to 2023. In April 2017, the EPA announced it is reconsidering the ELG rule and court challenges have been placed in abeyance pending EPA’s review. We are evaluating the final rule and related developments and cannot predict the resulting impact on our operations or consolidated financial results, but believe costs to comply could be material if the rule is implemented in its current or substantially similar form.
In October 2014, the EPA’s final standards for cooling intake structures at power plants to protect aquatic life took effect. The standards, based on Section 316(b) of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA), require subject facilities to choose among seven best available technology options to reduce fish impingement. In addition, some facilities must conduct studies to assist permitting authorities to determine whether and what site-specific controls, if any, would be required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms. Our current analysis indicates this rule will not have a significant impact on our coal plants that employ cooling towers. Biological monitoring may be required for La Cygne Generating Station (La Cygne) and Wolf Creek. We are
currently evaluating the rule’s impact on those two plants and cannot predict the resulting impact on our operations or consolidated financial results, but we do not expect it to be material.
In June 2015, the EPA along with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a final rule, effective August 2015, defining the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) for purposes of the CWA. This rulemaking has the potential to impact all programs under the CWA. Expansion of regulated waterways is possible under the rule depending on regulating authority interpretation, which could impact several permitting programs. Various states and others have filed lawsuits challenging the WOTUS rule in district courts and courts of appeals across the country. The appellate court challenges have been consolidated in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and, in October 2015, the Sixth Circuit issued an order that temporarily stays implementation of the WOTUS rule nationwide pending the outcome of the various legal challenges. In March 2017, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers published in the Federal Register a notice of intent to review and rescind or revise the WOTUS rule, as required by an Executive Order signed in February 2017. We are currently evaluating the WOTUS rule and related developments. We do not believe the rule, if upheld and implemented in its current or substantially similar form, will have a material impact on our operations or consolidated financial results.
Regulation of Coal Combustion Residuals
In the course of operating our coal generation plants, we produce coal combustion residuals (CCRs), including fly ash, gypsum and bottom ash. We recycle some of our ash production, principally by selling to the aggregate industry. The EPA published a rule to regulate CCRs in April 2015, which we believe will require additional CCR handling, processing and storage equipment and closure of certain ash disposal ponds. Impacts to operations will be dependent on the development of groundwater monitoring of CCR units being completed in 2017. We have recorded an ARO for our current estimate for closure of ash disposal ponds but we may be required to record additional AROs in the future due to changes in existing CCR regulations, changes in interpretation of existing CCR regulations or changes in the timing or cost to close ash disposal ponds. If additional AROs are necessary, we believe the impact on our operations or consolidated financial results could be material.
Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
In 2010, the Department of Energy (DOE) filed a motion with the NRC to withdraw its then pending application to construct a national repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. An NRC board denied the DOE’s motion to withdraw its application and the DOE appealed that decision to the full NRC. In 2011, the NRC issued an evenly split decision on the appeal and also ordered the licensing board to close out its work on the DOE’s application by the end of 2011 due to a lack of funding. These agency actions prompted the states of Washington and South Carolina, and a county in South Carolina, to file a lawsuit in a federal Court of Appeals asking the court to compel the NRC to resume its license review and to issue a decision on the license application. In August 2013, the court ordered the NRC to resume its review of the DOE’s application. The NRC has not yet issued its decision.
Wolf Creek is currently evaluating alternatives for expanding its existing on-site spent nuclear fuel storage to provide additional capacity prior to 2025. Wolf Creek is in discussions with the DOE to determine which of its incremental costs may be reimbursable. We cannot predict when, or if, an off-site storage site or alternative disposal site will be available to receive Wolf Creek’s spent nuclear fuel and will continue to monitor this activity.
12. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We and our subsidiaries are involved in various legal, environmental and regulatory proceedings. We believe that adequate provisions have been made and accordingly believe that the ultimate disposition of such matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial results. See Notes 4 and 11, “Rate Matters and Regulation” and “Commitments and Contingencies,” for additional information.
Pending Merger
Following the announcement of the merger agreement, two putative class action complaints (which were consolidated and superseded by a consolidated complaint) and one putative derivative complaint challenging the merger were filed in the District Court of Shawnee County, Kansas.
The consolidated putative class action complaint, filed on July 25, 2016, is captioned In re Westar Energy, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, Case No. 2016-CV-000457. This complaint names as defendants Westar Energy, the members of our board of directors and Great Plains Energy. The complaint asserts that the members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to our shareholders in connection with the proposed merger. It also asserts that Westar Energy and Great Plains Energy aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaint alleges, among other things, that (i) the merger consideration deprives our shareholders of fair consideration for their shares, (ii) the merger agreement contains deal protection provisions that unfairly favor Great Plains Energy and discourage third parties from submitting potentially superior proposals, (iii) the disclosures are misleading and/or omit material information necessary for our shareholders to make an informed decision whether to vote in favor of the proposed transaction and (iv) if the proposed transaction is consummated, certain of our directors and officers stand to receive significant benefits. The complaint seeks, among other remedies, (i) injunctive relief enjoining the merger, (ii) rescission of the merger agreement or rescissory damages, (iii) a directive to members of our board of directors to account for all damages caused by them as a result of their breaches of their fiduciary duties and (iv) an award for costs and disbursements, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees.
The putative derivative complaint, filed on July 5, 2016, and as amended on August 25, 2016, is captioned Braunstein v. Chandler et al., Case No. 2016-CV-000502. This putative derivative action names as defendants the members of our board of directors, Great Plains Energy and a subsidiary of Great Plains Energy, with Westar Energy named as a nominal defendant. The complaint asserts that the members of our board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to our shareholders in connection with the proposed merger. It also asserts that Great Plains Energy and a subsidiary of Great Plains Energy aided and abetted such breaches of fiduciary duties. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the members of our board of directors failed to obtain the best possible price for our shareholders because of a flawed process that discouraged third parties from submitting potentially superior proposals, and that the disclosures are false or misleading due to the omission of certain information. The complaint seeks, among other remedies, (i) a direction that the director defendants exercise their fiduciary duties to obtain a transaction which is in the best interests of us and our shareholders, (ii) a declaration that the proposed transaction was entered into in breach of the fiduciary duties of the defendants and is therefore unlawful and unenforceable, (iii) rescission of the merger agreement, (iv) the imposition of a constructive trust in favor of the plaintiff, on behalf of us, upon any benefits improperly received by the named defendants as a result of their wrongful conduct, (v) award for costs, including attorneys’ fees and experts’ fees, and (vi) the imposition of an injunction against the defendants and others from consummating the merger on the terms proposed.
On September 21, 2016, the parties in the consolidated putative class action and the putative derivative complaint independently agreed to withdraw requests for injunctive relief and otherwise agreed in principle to dismissing the actions with prejudice and to providing releases. In exchange, the parties in the putative derivative complaint agreed that we would make supplemental disclosures to the shareholders, which disclosures were made in a Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2016, and the parties in the consolidated putative class action agreed that we would (i) make the disclosures in the Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2016, and (ii) grant waivers of the prohibition on requesting a waiver of the standstill provisions in the confidentiality and standstill agreements executed by the bidders that participated in the our sale process. These agreements do not constitute any admission by any of the defendants as to the merits of any claims. In the future the parties will prepare and present to the court for approval Stipulations of Settlement that will, if accepted by the court, settle the actions in their entirety.
13. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
In determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we assess the entity’s purpose and design, including the nature of the entity’s activities and the risks that the entity was designed to create and pass through to its variable interest holders. A reporting enterprise is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE. The trusts holding our 8% interest in Jeffrey Energy Center (JEC) and our 50% interest in La Cygne unit 2 are VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary.
We assess all entities with which we become involved to determine whether such entities are VIEs and, if so, whether or not we are the primary beneficiary of the entities. We also continuously assess whether we are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs with which we are involved. Prospective changes in facts and circumstances may cause us to reconsider our determination as it relates to the identification of the primary beneficiary.
8% Interest in Jeffrey Energy Center
Under an agreement that expires in January 2019, we lease an 8% interest in JEC from a trust. The trust was financed with an equity contribution from an owner participant and debt issued by the trust. The trust was created specifically to purchase the 8% interest in JEC and lease it to a third party, and does not hold any other assets. We meet the requirements to be considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. In determining the primary beneficiary of the trust, we concluded that the activities of the trust that most significantly impact its economic performance and that we have the power to direct include (1) the operation and maintenance of the 8% interest in JEC, (2) our ability to exercise a purchase option at the end of the agreement at the lesser of fair value or a fixed amount and (3) our option to require refinancing of the trust’s debt. We are currently evaluating if we will exercise the purchase option, which expires July 2017. We have the potential to receive benefits from the trust that could potentially be significant if the fair value of the 8% interest in JEC at the end of the agreement is greater than the fixed amount. The possibility of lower interest rates upon refinancing the debt also creates the potential for us to receive significant benefits.
50% Interest in La Cygne Unit 2
Under an agreement that expires in September 2029, KGE entered into a sale-leaseback transaction with a trust under which the trust purchased KGE’s 50% interest in La Cygne unit 2 and subsequently leased it back to KGE. The trust was financed with an equity contribution from an owner participant and debt issued by the trust. The trust was created specifically to purchase the 50% interest in La Cygne unit 2 and lease it back to KGE, and does not hold any other assets. We meet the requirements to be considered the primary beneficiary of the trust. In determining the primary beneficiary of the trust, we concluded that the activities of the trust that most significantly impact its economic performance and that we have the power to direct include (1) the operation and maintenance of the 50% interest in La Cygne unit 2 and (2) our ability to exercise a purchase option at the end of the agreement at the lesser of fair value or a fixed amount. We have the potential to receive
benefits from the trust that could potentially be significant if the fair value of the 50% interest in La Cygne unit 2 at the end of
the agreement is greater than the fixed amount.
Financial Statement Impact
We have recorded the following assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets related to the VIEs described above.
|
| | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (In Thousands) |
Assets: | | | |
Property, plant and equipment of variable interest entities, net | $ | 255,321 |
| | $ | 257,904 |
|
Regulatory assets (a) | 10,791 |
| | 10,396 |
|
| | | |
Liabilities: | | | |
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities | $ | 28,538 |
| | $ | 26,842 |
|
Accrued interest (b) | 19 |
| | 867 |
|
Long-term debt of variable interest entities, net | 82,663 |
| | 111,209 |
|
_______________
(a) Included in long-term regulatory assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
(b) Included in accrued interest on our consolidated balance sheets.
All of the liabilities noted in the table above relate to the purchase of the property, plant and equipment. The assets of the VIEs can be used only to settle obligations of the VIEs and the VIEs’ debt holders have no recourse to our general credit. We have not provided financial or other support to the VIEs and are not required to provide such support. We did not record any gain or loss upon initial consolidation of the VIEs.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain matters discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis are “forward-looking statements.” The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 has established that these statements qualify for safe harbors from liability. Forward-looking statements may include words like we “believe,” “anticipate,” “target,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend” and words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements describe our future plans, objectives, expectations or goals.
INTRODUCTION
We are the largest electric utility in Kansas. We produce, transmit and sell electricity at retail to customers in Kansas under the regulation of the KCC. We also supply electric energy at wholesale to municipalities and electric cooperatives in Kansas under the regulation of FERC. We have contracts for the sale or purchase of wholesale electricity with other utilities.
In Management’s Discussion and Analysis, we discuss our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, our general financial condition and significant changes that occurred during 2017. As you read Management’s Discussion and Analysis, please refer to our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes, which contain our operating results.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ITEMS
Proposed Merger with Great Plains Energy
On May 29, 2016, we entered into an agreement and plan of merger with Great Plains Energy, providing for the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy with and into Westar Energy, with Westar Energy surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Great Plains Energy. The merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of approval of the KCC. On April 19, 2017, the KCC rejected the merger application citing, among other concerns, an excessive purchase price, Great Plains Energy’s capital structure, quantifiable and demonstrable customer benefits and staffing levels in our service territory. On May 4, 2017, we and Great Plains Energy filed with the KCC a petition for reconsideration of the KCC’s order and to set the matter for further proceedings so that we and Great Plains Energy may work together to determine whether it is feasible to develop a revised transaction that addresses the KCC’s concerns. Under applicable Kansas regulations, the KCC has 30 days following the filing of the petition for reconsideration to either deny or grant the petition. If we and Great Plains Energy agree on a revised transaction, then we and Great Plains Energy would expect to file the revised proposal and a supplemental application with the KCC. For information on the amount and form of consideration, and other information, see Notes 3 and 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Pending Merger” and “Legal Proceedings,” respectively, and Item “1A. Risk Factors.”
Earnings Per Share
Following is a summary of our net income and basic EPS.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | Change |
| | (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) |
Net income attributable to Westar Energy, Inc. | | $ | 59,661 |
| | $ | 65,585 |
| | $ | (5,924 | ) |
Earnings per common share, basic | | 0.42 |
| | 0.46 |
| | (0.04 | ) |
Net income and basic EPS decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to lower retail sales, higher operating expenses and a decrease in corporate-owned life insurance (COLI) benefits. See the discussion under “—Operating Results” below for additional information.
Current Trends
The following is an update to and is to be read in conjunction with “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our 2016 Form 10-K.
Environmental Regulation
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. Environmental laws and regulations affecting our operations are overlapping, complex, subject to changes, have generally become more stringent over time and are expensive to implement. There are a variety of final and proposed laws and regulations that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and consolidated financial results. See Note 11, “Commitments and Contingencies,” for a discussion of environmental costs, laws, regulations and other contingencies.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” contains a summary of our significant accounting policies, many of which require the use of estimates and assumptions by management. The policies highlighted in our 2016 Form 10-K have an impact on our reported results that may be material due to the levels of judgment and subjectivity necessary to account for uncertain matters or their susceptibility to change.
From December 31, 2016, through March 31, 2017, we did not experience any significant changes in our critical accounting estimates. For additional information, see our 2016 Form 10-K.
OPERATING RESULTS
We evaluate operating results based on EPS. We have various classifications of revenues, defined as follows:
Retail: Sales of electricity to residential, commercial and industrial customers. Classification of customers as residential, commercial or industrial requires judgment and our classifications may be different from other companies. Assignment of tariffs is not dependent on classification. Other retail sales of electricity include lighting for public streets and highways, net of revenue subject to refund.
Wholesale: Sales of electricity to electric cooperatives, municipalities, other electric utilities and RTOs, the prices for which are either based on cost or prevailing market prices as prescribed by FERC authority. Revenues from these sales are either included in the RECA or used in the determinations of base rates at the time of our next general rate review.
Transmission: Reflects transmission revenues, including those based on tariffs with the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP).
Other: Miscellaneous electric revenues including ancillary service revenues and rent from electric property leased to others. This category also includes transactions unrelated to the production of our generating assets and fees we earn for services that we provide for third parties.
Electric utility revenues are impacted by things such as rate regulation, fuel costs, technology, customer behavior, the economy and competitive forces. Changing weather also affects the amount of electricity our customers use as electricity sales are seasonal. As a summer peaking utility, the third quarter typically accounts for our greatest electricity sales. Hot summer temperatures and cold winter temperatures prompt more demand, especially among residential and commercial customers, and to a lesser extent, industrial customers. Mild weather reduces customer demand. Our wholesale revenues are impacted by, among other factors, demand, cost and availability of fuel and purchased power, price volatility, available generation capacity, transmission availability and weather.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017, Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Below we discuss our operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the results for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Significant changes in results of operations shown in the table immediately below are further explained in the descriptions that follow.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) |
REVENUES: | | | | | | | |
Residential | $ | 176,169 |
| | $ | 179,290 |
| | $ | (3,121 | ) | | (1.7 | ) |
Commercial | 155,707 |
| | 165,673 |
| | (9,966 | ) | | (6.0 | ) |
Industrial | 98,516 |
| | 100,697 |
| | (2,181 | ) | | (2.2 | ) |
Other retail | (12,349 | ) | | (14,381 | ) | | 2,032 |
| | 14.1 |
|
Total Retail Revenues | 418,043 |
| | 431,279 |
| | (13,236 | ) | | (3.1 | ) |
Wholesale | 77,367 |
| | 67,412 |
| | 9,955 |
| | 14.8 |
|
Transmission | 69,441 |
| | 63,915 |
| | 5,526 |
| | 8.6 |
|
Other | 7,723 |
| | 6,844 |
| | 879 |
| | 12.8 |
|
Total Revenues | 572,574 |
| | 569,450 |
| | 3,124 |
| | 0.5 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: | | | | | | | |
Fuel and purchased power | 113,855 |
| | 100,058 |
| | 13,797 |
| | 13.8 |
|
SPP network transmission costs | 60,674 |
| | 60,760 |
| | (86 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
Operating and maintenance | 81,198 |
| | 77,757 |
| | 3,441 |
| | 4.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 88,625 |
| | 83,640 |
| | 4,985 |
| | 6.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative | 59,157 |
| | 56,456 |
| | 2,701 |
| | 4.8 |
|
Taxes other than income tax | 42,716 |
| | 48,968 |
| | (6,252 | ) | | (12.8 | ) |
Total Operating Expenses | 446,225 |
| | 427,639 |
| | 18,586 |
| | 4.3 |
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS | 126,349 |
| | 141,811 |
| | (15,462 | ) | | (10.9 | ) |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE): | | | | | | | |
Investment earnings | 3,155 |
| | 2,016 |
| | 1,139 |
| | 56.5 |
|
Other income | 1,300 |
| | 9,477 |
| | (8,177 | ) | | (86.3 | ) |
Other expense | (5,316 | ) | | (5,543 | ) | | 227 |
| | 4.1 |
|
Total Other (Expense) Income | (861 | ) | | 5,950 |
| | (6,811 | ) | | (114.5 | ) |
Interest expense | 41,095 |
| | 40,431 |
| | 664 |
| | 1.6 |
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 84,393 |
| | 107,330 |
| | (22,937 | ) | | (21.4 | ) |
Income tax expense | 20,911 |
| | 38,622 |
| | (17,711 | ) | | (45.9 | ) |
NET INCOME | 63,482 |
| | 68,708 |
| | (5,226 | ) | | (7.6 | ) |
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3,821 |
| | 3,123 |
| | 698 |
| | 22.4 |
|
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. | $ | 59,661 |
| | $ | 65,585 |
| | $ | (5,924 | ) | | (9.0 | ) |
BASIC EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | (0.04 | ) | | (8.7 | ) |
DILUTED EARNINGS PER AVERAGE COMMON SHARE OUTSTANDING ATTRIBUTABLE TO WESTAR ENERGY, INC. | $ | 0.42 |
| | $ | 0.46 |
| | $ | (0.04 | ) | | (8.7 | ) |
Gross Margin
Fuel and purchased power costs fluctuate with electricity sales and unit costs. As permitted by regulators, we adjust our retail prices to reflect changes in the costs of fuel and purchased power. Fuel and purchased power costs for wholesale customers are recovered at prevailing market prices or based on a predetermined formula with a price adjustment approved by FERC. As a result, changes in fuel and purchased power costs are offset in revenues with minimal impact on net income. In addition, SPP network transmission costs fluctuate due primarily to investments by us and other members of the SPP for upgrades to the transmission grid within the SPP RTO. As with fuel and purchased power costs, changes in SPP network transmission costs are mostly reflected in the prices we charge customers with minimal impact on net income. For these reasons, we believe gross margin is useful for understanding and analyzing changes in our operating performance from one period to the next. We calculate gross margin as total revenues, including transmission revenues, less the sum of fuel and purchased power costs and amounts billed by the SPP for network transmission costs. Accordingly, gross margin reflects transmission revenues and costs on a net basis. The following table summarizes our gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Revenues | $ | 572,574 |
| | $ | 569,450 |
| | $ | 3,124 |
| | 0.5 |
|
Less: Fuel and purchased power expense | 113,855 |
| | 100,058 |
| | 13,797 |
| | 13.8 |
|
SPP network transmission costs | 60,674 |
| | 60,760 |
| | (86 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
Gross Margin | $ | 398,045 |
| | $ | 408,632 |
| | $ | (10,587 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
The following table reflects changes in electricity sales for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016. No electricity sales are shown for transmission or other as they are not directly related to the amount of electricity we sell.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Thousands of MWh) |
ELECTRICITY SALES: | | | | | | | |
Residential | 1,354 |
|
| 1,397 |
| | (43 | ) | | (3.1 | ) |
Commercial | 1,617 |
|
| 1,659 |
| | (42 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
Industrial | 1,334 |
|
| 1,302 |
| | 32 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Other retail | 20 |
|
| 20 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total Retail | 4,325 |
| | 4,378 |
| | (53 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
Wholesale | 2,491 |
| | 1,875 |
| | 616 |
| | 32.9 |
|
Total | 6,816 |
| | 6,253 |
| | 563 |
| | 9.0 |
|
Gross margin decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to lower retail sales. The lower retail electric sales were attributable principally to warmer winter weather, which particularly impacts residential and commercial electricity sales. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, there were approximately 9% fewer heating degree days. Since 2016 was a leap year, this also contributed to lower retail sales as there was one less calendar day during the three months ended March 31, 2017.
Income from operations is the most directly comparable measure to our presentation of gross margin that is calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP in our consolidated statements of income. Our presentation of gross margin should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for income from operations. Additionally, our presentation of gross margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. The following table reconciles income from operations with gross margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Income from operations | $ | 126,349 |
| | $ | 141,811 |
| | $ | (15,462 | ) | | (10.9 | ) |
Plus: Operating and maintenance expense | 81,198 |
| | 77,757 |
| | 3,441 |
| | 4.4 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense | 88,625 |
| | 83,640 |
| | 4,985 |
| | 6.0 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense | 59,157 |
| | 56,456 |
| | 2,701 |
| | 4.8 |
|
Taxes other than income tax | 42,716 |
| | 48,968 |
| | (6,252 | ) | | (12.8 | ) |
Gross Margin | $ | 398,045 |
| | $ | 408,632 |
| | $ | (10,587 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
Operating Expenses and Other Income and Expense Items
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Operating and maintenance expense | $ | 81,198 |
| | $ | 77,757 |
| | $ | 3,441 |
| | 4.4 |
Operating and maintenance expense increased for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to higher distribution expense of $3.9 million due primarily to our taking advantage of the warmer winter weather and executing our vegetation management strategy earlier in the year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Depreciation and amortization expense | $ | 88,625 |
| | $ | 83,640 |
| | $ | 4,985 |
| | 6.0 |
Depreciation and amortization expense increased during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, due in part to the start of operation of our Western Plains Wind Farm in March 2017.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Selling, general and administrative expense | $ | 59,157 |
| | $ | 56,456 |
| | $ | 2,701 |
| | 4.8 |
Selling, general and administrative expense increased during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period of 2016, due primarily to:
| |
• | higher labor and employee benefit costs of $1.8 million; and |
| |
• | higher merger-related expenses of $0.4 million. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Taxes other than income tax | $ | 42,716 |
| | $ | 48,968 |
| | $ | (6,252 | ) | | (12.8 | ) |
Taxes other than income tax decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to a $6.7 million decrease in property tax expense amortization. This represents the amortization of the regulatory asset comprised of actual costs incurred for property taxes in the prior year in excess of amounts collected in our prices in the prior year.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Other income | $ | 1,300 |
| | $ | 9,477 |
| | $ | (8,177 | ) | | (86.3 | ) |
Other income decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to a decrease in COLI benefits of $6.5 million and lower equity AFUDC of $1.7 million.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, |
| 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Income tax expense | $ | 20,911 |
| | $ | 38,622 |
| | $ | (17,711 | ) | | (45.9 | ) |
Income tax expense decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, due primarily to lower income before income taxes and increases in tax benefits from production tax credits and stock-based compensation.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
A number of factors affected amounts recorded on our balance sheet as of March 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Regulatory assets | $ | 873,374 |
| | $ | 879,862 |
| | $ | (6,488 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
Regulatory liabilities | 238,916 |
| | 239,453 |
| | (537 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
Net regulatory assets | $ | 634,458 |
| | $ | 640,409 |
| | $ | (5,951 | ) | | (0.9 | ) |
Total regulatory assets decreased due primarily to the following items:
| |
• | a $8.3 million decrease in deferred employee benefit costs; |
| |
• | a $5.3 million decrease in amounts due from customers for future income taxes; and |
| |
• | a $3.5 million decrease in amounts deferred for Wolf Creek refueling and maintenance outages; however, |
| |
• | partially offsetting these decreases was a $6.7 million increase in conditional AROs; |
| |
• | a $3.3 million increase in amounts to be collected from our customers for the deferred cost of fuel and purchased power; and |
| |
• | $2.2 million increase in amounts deferred for property taxes. |
Total regulatory liabilities decreased due primarily to the following items:
| |
• | spending $5.7 million more than collected for the cost to remove retired plant assets; and |
| |
• | a $1.2 million decrease for the FERC settlement refund obligation and a $1.3 million decrease for the KCC approved refund obligation related to the reduced ROE in our TFR; however, |
| |
• | partially offsetting these decreases was a $12.7 million increase in the fair value of the NDT. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Current maturities of long-term debt | $ | — |
| | $ | 125,000 |
| | $ | (125,000 | ) | | (100.0 | ) |
Long-term debt, net | 3,685,752 |
| | 3,388,670 |
| | 297,082 |
| | 8.8 |
|
Total long-term debt | $ | 3,685,752 |
| | $ | 3,513,670 |
| | $ | 172,082 |
| | 4.9 |
|
Westar Energy issued $300.0 million in principal amount of FMBs and retired $125.0 million in principal amount of FMBs during the three months ended March 31, 2017. See Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt Financing” for additional information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Current maturities of long-term debt of variable interest entities | $ | 28,538 |
| | $ | 26,842 |
| | $ | 1,696 |
| | 6.3 |
|
Long-term debt of variable interest entities | 82,663 |
| | 111,209 |
| | (28,546 | ) | | (25.7 | ) |
Total long-term debt of variable interest entities | $ | 111,201 |
| | $ | 138,051 |
| | $ | (26,850 | ) | | (19.4 | ) |
Total long-term debt of VIEs decreased due to the VIEs that hold the JEC and La Cygne leasehold interests having made principal payments totaling $26.8 million.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Short-term debt | $ | 226,300 |
| | $ | 366,700 |
| | $ | (140,400 | ) | | (38.3 | ) |
Short-term debt decreased due primarily to Westar Energy issuing $300.0 million in principal amount of FMBs, the proceeds for which were used to repay commercial paper, and us retiring $125.0 million in principal amount of FMBs. See Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt Financing” for additional information.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| As of | | As of | | | | |
| March 31, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| (Dollars in Thousands) |
Accrued taxes | $ | 126,497 |
| | $ | 85,729 |
| | $ | 40,768 |
| | 47.6 |
Accrued taxes increased due primarily to a $41.0 million increase in accrued property taxes due to timing of payments.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Available sources of funds to operate our business include internally generated cash, short-term borrowings under Westar Energy’s commercial paper program and revolving credit facilities and access to capital markets. We expect to meet our day-to-day cash requirements including, among other items, fuel and purchased power, dividends, interest payments, income taxes and pension contributions, using primarily internally generated cash and short-term borrowings. To meet the cash requirements for our capital investments, we expect to use internally generated cash, short-term borrowings, and proceeds from the issuance of debt and equity securities in the capital markets. When such balances are of sufficient size and it makes economic sense to do so, we also use proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and equity securities to repay short-term borrowings, which are principally related to investments in capital equipment and the redemption of bonds and for working capital and general corporate purposes. Uncertainties affecting our ability to meet cash requirements include, among others, factors affecting revenues described in “—Operating Results” above, economic conditions, regulatory actions, compliance with environmental regulations and conditions in the capital markets.
Short-Term Borrowings
Westar Energy maintains a commercial paper program pursuant to which it may issue commercial paper up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any one time of $1.0 billion. This program is supported by Westar Energy’s revolving credit facilities. Maturities of commercial paper issuances may not exceed 365 days from the date of issuance and proceeds from such issuances will be used to temporarily fund capital expenditures, to redeem debt on an interim basis, for working capital and/or for other general corporate purposes. As of May 3, 2017, Westar Energy had $295.9 million of commercial paper issued and outstanding.
Westar Energy has two revolving credit facilities in the amounts of $730.0 million and $270.0 million. The $730.0 million facility will expire in September 2019, $20.7 million of which will expire in September 2017. The $270.0 million credit facility will expire in February 2018. As long as there is no default under the facilities, the $730.0 million and $270.0 million facilities may be extended an additional year and the aggregate amount of borrowings under the $730.0 million and $270.0 million facilities may be increased to $1.0 billion and $400.0 million, respectively, subject to lender participation. All borrowings under the facilities are secured by KGE FMBs. Total combined borrowings under the revolving credit facilities and the commercial paper program may not exceed $1.0 billion at any given time. As of May 3, 2017, no amounts were borrowed and $54.1 million in letters of credit had been issued under the $730.0 million facility. No amounts were borrowed and no letters of credit were issued under the $270.0 million facility as of the same date.
Long-Term Debt Financing
In January 2017, Westar Energy retired $125.0 million in principal amount of FMBs bearing a stated interest at 5.15% maturing January 2017.
In March 2017, Westar Energy issued $300.0 million in principal amount of FMBs bearing a stated interest at 3.10% and maturing April 2027.
Debt Covenants
We were in compliance with our debt covenants as of March 31, 2017.
Impact of Credit Ratings on Debt Financing
Moody’s and S&P are independent credit-rating agencies that rate our debt securities. These ratings indicate each agency’s assessment of our ability to pay interest and principal when due on our securities.
In general, more favorable credit ratings increase borrowing opportunities and reduce the cost of borrowing. Under Westar Energy’s revolving credit facilities and commercial paper program, our cost of borrowings is determined in part by credit ratings. However, Westar Energy’s ability to borrow under the credit facilities and commercial paper program are not conditioned on maintaining a particular credit rating. We may enter into new credit agreements that contain credit rating conditions, which could affect our liquidity and/or our borrowing costs.
Factors that impact our credit ratings include a combination of objective and subjective criteria. Objective criteria include typical financial ratios, such as total debt to total capitalization and funds from operations to total debt, among others, future capital expenditures and our access to liquidity including committed lines of credit. Subjective criteria include such items as the quality and credibility of management, the political and regulatory environment we operate in and an assessment of our governance and risk management practices.
As of May 3, 2017, our ratings with the agencies are as shown in the table below.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Westar Energy First Mortgage Bond Rating | | KGE First Mortgage Bond Rating | | Westar Energy Commercial Paper | | Rating Outlook |
Moody’s | A2 | | A2 | | P-2 | | Stable |
S&P | A | | A | | A-2 | | Negative |
Summary of Cash Flows
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2017 | | 2016 | | Change | | % Change |
| | (Dollars In Thousands) |
Cash flows from (used in): | | | | | | | | |
Operating activities | | $ | 237,123 |
| | $ | 238,876 |
| | $ | (1,753 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
Investing activities | | (176,122 | ) | | (197,761 | ) | | 21,639 |
| | 10.9 |
|
Financing activities | | (60,708 | ) | | (40,875 | ) | | (19,833 | ) | | (48.5 | ) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 293 |
| | $ | 240 |
| | $ | 53 |
| | 22.1 |
|
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
Cash flows used in investing activities decreased due primarily to our having invested $45.4 million less in additions to property, plant and equipment. Partially offsetting this decrease was our having received $23.9 million less from our investment in COLI.
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities
Cash flows used in financing activities increased due principally to our having issued $206.9 million less in commercial paper, having issued $162.0 million of long-term debt of VIEs in 2016 and having redeemed $125.0 million of long-term debt in 2017. Partially offsetting these increases was our having received proceeds of $296.5 million for the issuance of long-term debt in 2017, having redeemed $163.5 million less in long-term debt of VIEs and having repaid $22.8 million less for borrowings against the cash surrender value of COLI.
Pension Contribution
During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we contributed $7.0 million to the Westar Energy pension trust. No payments were made to fund the Wolf Creek pension plan during the same period.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
From December 31, 2016, through March 31, 2017, our off-balance sheet arrangements did not change materially. For additional information, see our 2016 Form 10-K.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
From December 31, 2016, through March 31, 2017, our contractual obligations and commercial commitments did not change materially outside the ordinary course of business. For additional information, see our 2016 Form 10-K.
OTHER INFORMATION
Changes in Prices
See Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Rate Matters and Regulation,” for information on our prices.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for information on accounting pronouncements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to market risk, including changes in commodity prices, counterparty credit, interest rates and debt and equity instrument values. From December 31, 2016, to March 31, 2017, no significant changes occurred in our market risk exposure. See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our 2016 Form 10-K for additional information.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We maintain a set of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this report, based on an evaluation carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended March 31, 2017, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Information on legal proceedings is set forth in Notes 11 and 12 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies” and “Legal Proceedings,” respectively, which are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our 2016 Form 10-K contains descriptions of risk factors relating to us, as required by Item 503(c) of Regulation S-K. The sixth risk factor under the heading “Risks Relating to our Business” and the second risk factor under the heading “Risks Relating to the Pending Merger,” in each case, included in the 2016 Form 10-K, Item 1A. Risk Factors, are replaced with the respective risk factors described below. Except as indicated below, or as otherwise described in filings we make from time to time with the SEC, there were no material changes in our risk factors from December 31, 2016, through March 31, 2017.
We are exposed to various risks associated with the ownership and operation of Wolf Creek, any of which could adversely impact our consolidated financial results.
Through KGE’s ownership interest in Wolf Creek, we are subject to the risks of nuclear generation, which include:
| |
• | the risks associated with storing, handling and disposing of radioactive materials and the current lack of a long-term off-site disposal solution for radioactive materials; |
| |
• | limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with nuclear operations; |
| |
• | uncertainties with respect to procurement of nuclear fuel and related services; |
| |
• | uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning Wolf Creek at the end of its life; and |
| |
• | costs of measures associated with public safety. |
The NRC has authority to impose licensing and safety-related requirements for the operation of nuclear generation facilities. In the event of non-compliance, the NRC has authority to impose fines or shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. Revised safety requirements enacted by the NRC could necessitate substantial capital expenditures at Wolf Creek.
An incident at Wolf Creek could have a material impact on our consolidated financial results. Furthermore, the non-compliance of other nuclear facilities operators with applicable regulations or the occurrence of a serious nuclear incident at other facilities anywhere in the world could result in increased regulation of the industry or a retrospective premium assessment under our nuclear insurance coverage, both of which could increase Wolf Creek’s costs and impact our consolidated financial results. Such events could also result in a shutdown of Wolf Creek.
In March 2017, Westinghouse Electric Company (Westinghouse), which is the sole supplier for fuel and related services to Wolf Creek, filed voluntary petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Westinghouse has stated that it intends to continue normal business operations. However, an extended outage of Wolf Creek could occur if Westinghouse is not able to perform under its contracts with Wolf Creek. Switching to another supplier could take an extended amount of time, and would require NRC approval. An extended outage at Wolf Creek could affect the amount of our Wolf Creek investment included in our prices, and could have a material impact on our consolidated financial results.
The merger is subject to the receipt of consent or approval from governmental entities that could delay the completion of the merger or impose conditions that could have a material adverse effect on the combined company.
Completion of the merger is conditioned upon receipt of consents, orders, approvals or clearances, as required, from, among others, the FERC, the NRC and the KCC (provided that such approvals do not result in a material adverse effect on Great Plains Energy and its subsidiaries after giving effect to the merger).
On June 28, 2016, we and Great Plains Energy filed a joint application with the KCC requesting approval of the merger. On April 19, 2017, the KCC rejected the merger application citing, among other concerns, an excessive price, Great Plains Energy’s capital structure, quantifiable and demonstrable customer benefits and staffing levels in our service territory. On May 4, 2017, we and Great Plains Energy filed with the KCC a petition for reconsideration of the KCC’s order and to set the matter for further proceedings so that we and Great Plains Energy may work together to determine whether it is feasible to develop a revised transaction that addresses the KCC concerns. Under applicable Kansas regulations, the KCC has 30 days following the filing of the petition for reconsideration to either deny or grant the petition. If we and Great Plains Energy agree on a revised transaction, then we and Great Plains Energy would expect to file the revised proposal and a supplemental application with the KCC.
In addition, there are two open dockets in Missouri related to the merger. In the first docket, Great Plains Energy sought approval from the MPSC to waive certain affiliate transaction rules following the closing of the merger. In this docket, on October 12, 2016, and on October 26, 2016, the MPSC staff and the OPC, respectively, announced that each had entered into a Stipulation and Agreement with Great Plains Energy that, among other things, provided that MPSC staff and the OPC would not file a complaint, or support another complaint, to assert that the MPSC has jurisdiction over the merger. The Stipulation and Agreements are subject to approval by the MPSC. Regarding the second docket, on October 11, 2016, a consumer group filed complaints against us and Great Plains Energy with the MPSC seeking to have the MPSC assert jurisdiction over the merger, and various parties have intervened in these complaints. The MPSC dismissed the complaint against us on December 6, 2016, but on February 22, 2017, the MPSC ordered that Great Plains Energy was required to obtain MPSC approval prior to consummation of the merger. On February 23, 2017, Great Plains Energy filed an application with the MPSC seeking approval of the merger. The merger application docket was consolidated with the affiliate transaction waiver docket. Several parties filed testimony and the evidentiary hearing was held in April 2017. On April 20, 2017, after the KCC’s order rejecting the merger was issued, Great Plains Energy filed a motion to suspend the briefing schedule in the MPSC merger docket, effectively suspending that proceeding indefinitely until Great Plains Energy takes further action in the docket.
On July 11, 2016, we and Great Plains filed a joint application with the FERC requesting approval of the merger. Approval of the merger application requires action by the FERC commissioners because it is a contested application. The FPA requires a quorum of three or more commissioners to act on a contested application. Following the resignation of the FERC Chairman effective February 3, 2017, the FERC commission is comprised only of two commissioners and is therefore unable to act on the application. A new commissioner must be appointed by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, before FERC will be able to act on the application. If the FERC commissioners do not issue an order on the application within 180 days after the application was deemed complete because of the lack of a quorum, approval of the application may be deemed granted by operation of law, unless an order is issued extending the time for review. On May 3, 2017, the FERC staff extended the time period for a review of the application until November 1, 2017. We are unable to predict when FERC will regain a quorum or how the change in commissioners will impact the review of the application.
In addition, completion of the merger is conditioned upon the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act. We and Great Plains Energy filed the antitrust notifications required under the HSR Act on September 26, 2016, and received early termination of the statutory waiting period under the HSR Act on October 21, 2016. Under the HSR Act, a new statutory waiting period will start one year from the date on which an existing waiting period expires, or October 21, 2017. Accordingly, if the merger has not closed prior to October 21, 2017, we and Great Plains Energy will need to re-file the necessary HSR Act notifications. Although the United States Department of Justice allowed the statutory waiting period under the HSR Act to terminate following our initial HSR Act notification, there can be no assurance that it would do so again, or that it would not impose burdensome terms or conditions on the merger that may prevent the merger from occurring or eliminate the potential benefits of the merger.
A substantial delay in obtaining satisfactory approvals or the imposition of unfavorable terms or conditions in connection with such approvals could adversely affect the business, financial condition or results of operations of us or Great Plains Energy or may result in the termination of the merger agreement. Failure to receive satisfactory approvals may also make any alternative future strategic transaction more challenging, which could in turn negatively impact the price of our common stock.
For additional information on the status of various approvals in connection with the pending merger, see Notes 3 and 11 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Pending Merger” and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Investors should note that we announce material financial information in SEC filings, press releases and public conference calls. In accordance with SEC guidance, we may also use the Investor Relations section of our website (http://www.WestarEnergy.com, under “Investors”) to communicate with investors about our company. It is possible that the financial and other information we post there could be deemed to be material information. The information on our website is not part of this document.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
| | |
4.1 | | Form of Forty-Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 6, 2017, by and between Westar Energy, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor to Harris Trust and Savings Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2017) |
31(a) | | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 certifying the quarterly report provided for the period ended March 31, 2017 |
31(b) | | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 certifying the quarterly report provided for the period ended March 31, 2017 |
32 | | Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 certifying the quarterly report provided for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (furnished and not to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q) |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | WESTAR ENERGY, INC. |
| | | | | | |
Date: | | May 9, 2017 | | By: | | /s/ Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | | | Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit
Exhibit 31(a)
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark A. Ruelle, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, of Westar Energy, Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
a. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|
| | | | |
Date: | May 9, 2017 | | By: | /s/ Mark A. Ruelle |
| | | | Mark A. Ruelle |
| | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | | Westar Energy, Inc. |
| | | | |
Exhibit
Exhibit 31(b)
WESTAR ENERGY, INC.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Anthony D. Somma, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2017, of Westar Energy, Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|
| | | | |
Date: | May 9, 2017 | | By: | /s/ Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| | | | Westar Energy, Inc. |
| | | | |
Exhibit
Exhibit 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, Mark A. Ruelle, in my capacity as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Anthony D. Somma, in my capacity as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
| | | | |
Date: | May 9, 2017 | | By: | /s/ Mark A. Ruelle |
| | | | Mark A. Ruelle |
| | | | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
| | | | |
Date: | May 9, 2017 | | By: | /s/ Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | Anthony D. Somma |
| | | | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |